RNAstorm™ Kit – Powerful RNA extraction from FFPE samples

Formalin-fixed tissue samples are a challenge for RNA extraction, often resulting in low yields of amplifiable RNA and poor performance in subsequent steps involving enzymatic manipulation, including reverse transcription and sequencing library preparation.

Powered by proprietary CAT5™ technology, the RNAstorm™ extraction kit enhances the removal of formaldehyde-induced damage and provides RNA with higher yield and quality, better integrity, and greater amplifiability. This technology was developed by Cell Data Sciences researchers, building on research initiated at Stanford University, and published in Nature Chemistry in 2015.

Whether you are performing RNA-seq, qPCR, microarray or other gene expression analysis, the RNAstorm™ kit is your best chance for success.

A simple and convenient workflow

The RNAstorm kit offers a convenient workflow for extraction of high-yield and high-integrity RNA from FFPE samples.

Advantages

Higher Yields of Amplifiable RNA
Significant improvements in RNA yield and quality (as measured by amount of amplifiable RNA) are seen using a prototype of the RNAstorm™ kit on FFPE samples from various tissues and ranging in age from 1976 to 2015.

Comparison of RNA recovery by quantitative RT-PCR from FFPE tissues. “Q” represents competitive commercial FFPE extraction kits.

 

Higher Integrity RNA

Increased RNA integrity is observed for RNA extracted using the RNAstorm™ kit. An exemplary comparison with a popular commercial kit is shown below (Agilent Bioanalyzer RNA 6000 nano)

 

Increases in DV200 (the percentage of RNA with length > 200 nt) were seen for a variety of tissue samples.

FAQ’s

Is there any contaminating genomic DNA in the RNA obtained using the RNAstorm™ kit?

Contamination from genomic DNA is a big concern because it can intefere with downstream applications. The RNAstorm™ kit includes an optimized DNase digestion step which removes contaminating genomic DNA without significantly affecting RNA yield. While this step is optional, it is highly recommended.

How much RNA can I expect to obtain from an FFPE sample?

The biggest variable that affects the total amount of RNA obtained is the quality of the sample itself (i.e. the type and amount of tissue, and the care taken in isolation and preservation of the sample). Using the RNAstorm™ kit, and assuming at least reasonable sample quality, amounts greater than 1 µg can be obtained.

Can I isolate miRNAs using the RNAstorm™ kit?

Yes, the kit will isolate RNA of any size.

Can RNA obtained using the RNAstorm™ kit be used in RNA-Seq?

Yes. Good quality libraries can be obtained, providing that the RNA is of sufficiently high quality. For Illumina sequencing, a DV200 of at least 30% is recommended, and samples should be used that provide at least 1 µg of RNA.

How should the tissue be prepared?

Use a microtome to obtain 5-10 µm sections from FFPE samples. Sections thinner than 5 µm may be used if they can be reliably cut. Sections thicker than 10 µm are not recommended because they may not be fully digested.

Can I use tissue that is not paraffin-embedded?

Yes, tissue can be used which is not embedded in paraffin. In this case, we recommend mechanically grinding an amount of tissue equivalent to the recommended number of sections.

Which deparaffinization method do you recommend?

The RNAstorm™ kit includes a recommended Deparaffinization Reagent. Unlike other common methods (e.g. xylenes), the Deparaffinization Reagent is efficient, non-toxic and does not require the use of a fume hood. In our testing, the included reagent is at least as effective as xylenes at removing paraffin and allowing purification of high quality nucleic acids

What is the best way to quantitate RNA obtained from FFPE samples?

FFPE-derived RNA is much more challenging to quantitate accurately than RNA obtained from fresh samples. It is not enough to know the absolute amount of RNA that is present, but also whether the RNA will work in downstream applications, which depends on the following factors:

  • Fragment size distribution: a 5 µg sample (as measured by Qubit) can be useless for RNA-Seq if it consists of fragments < 200 nt.
  • Chemical modification: for RNA obtained from formalin-fixed samples, various chemical adducts and crosslinks, including base modifications, base-base crosslinks, and base-protein crosslinks can make nucleic acid molecules inaccessible to enzymes and therefore inactive in downstream applications.
  • Contamination: cellular debris, proteins, salts, and detergents used during purification can bias downstream assays. For example, UV/Vis-based methods such as Nanodrop are particularly susceptible to contaminants which absorb in the 200-280 nm range.
  • Fluorescence-based methods such as Qubit are liable to significant error. When working with low concentrations of DNA or RNA, dye-based detection may not be linear. One must also be mindful of contamination by genomic DNA in an RNA sample, because the dyes used for fluorescence quantitation are not entirely specific for FFPE-derived DNA or RNA.
  • Quantitative PCR is the preferred method for quantitation of heavily damaged and modified nucleic acids.
Should RIN numbers be used to determine quality of FFPE-derived RNA?

Although the RIN number can provide general information about the extent of sample fragmentation, it is not sensitive or predictable enough to be a useful indicator of downstream performance, especially for RNA-Seq. Very often, RIN numbers for FFPE-derived RNA will be between 2 and 3. Some of these samples will be useful for RNA-Seq, and others won’t – the RIN will not tell you, however.

A slightly better predictor of performance in RNA-Seq using Illumina sequencing is the DV200, which represents the percentage of RNA fragments longer than 200 nucleotides. The DV200 is also calculated based on Bioanalyzer data, but suffers from the same drawbacks as all Bioanalyzer-based methods, specifically high variability.

What do I need to know when extracting RNA from FFPE samples?
  • Avoid methods based on organic solvents (Trizol)
  • Avoid harsh chaotropic salts (i.e. guanidinium)
  • Avoid detergents which impact downstream quantitation by UV and/or Qubit (e.g. Triton X-100)
  • Do not rely on RIN to quantitate integrity of an FFPE-derived sample. See why. Use DV200 instead.
  • Use a kit or method that removes chemical modifications from formalin. Do not raise the temperature to 80˚C or above. Even short times at this temperature will significantly lower integrity.
  • Be wary of Qubit and Nanodrop concentrations.
  • Use qPCR to quantitate your RNA, and always look carefully at melt curves to determine whether the correct amplicon.

Resources: